Signalfire
Documentation on popular resistance, armed struggle and communist politics
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Analysis & Polemic
  • Armed Struggle & Counter Insurgency
  • Disclaimers
  • Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
  • International Communist Movement
  • International Maoism and anti-revisionism
  • NABPP-PC and Prison Movement
  • People’s War & Maoism in Nepal
  • People’s War in India
  • People’s War in Peru
  • Siraj Sikder Archive
  • Women Martyrs of the Indian Revolution
← Report: Future U.S. heat waves will be worse
Bush’s Search Policy For Travelers Is Kept – Obama Officials Say Oversight Will Grow →

Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Posted on September 3, 2009 by phillip

Internet companies and civil liberties groups were alarmed this spring when a U.S. Senate bill proposed handing the White House the power to disconnect private-sector computers from the Internet.

They’re not much happier about a revised version that aides to Sen. Jay Rockefeller, a West Virginia Democrat, have spent months drafting behind closed doors. CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.

The new version would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for “cybersecurity professionals,” and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.

“I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness,” said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, which counts representatives of Verizon, Verisign, Nortel, and Carnegie Mellon University on its board. “It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill.”

Representatives of other large Internet and telecommunications companies expressed concerns about the bill in a teleconference with Rockefeller’s aides this week, but were not immediately available for interviews on Thursday.

A spokesman for Rockefeller also declined to comment on the record Thursday, saying that many people were unavailable because of the summer recess. A Senate source familiar with the bill compared the president’s power to take control of portions of the Internet to what President Bush did when grounding all aircraft on Sept. 11, 2001. The source said that one primary concern was the electrical grid, and what would happen if it were attacked from a broadband connection.

When Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Commerce committee, and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) introduced the original bill in April, they claimed it was vital to protect national cybersecurity. “We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs–from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records,” Rockefeller said.

The Rockefeller proposal plays out against a broader concern in Washington, D.C., about the government’s role in cybersecurity. In May, President Obama acknowledged that the government is “not as prepared” as it should be to respond to disruptions and announced that a new cybersecurity coordinator position would be created inside the White House staff. Three months later, that post remains empty, one top cybersecurity aide has quit, and some wags have begun to wonder why a government that receives failing marks on cybersecurity should be trusted to instruct the private sector what to do.

Rockefeller’s revised legislation seeks to reshuffle the way the federal government addresses the topic. It requires a “cybersecurity workforce plan” from every federal agency, a “dashboard” pilot project, measurements of hiring effectiveness, and the implementation of a “comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy” in six months–even though its mandatory legal review will take a year to complete.

The privacy implications of sweeping changes implemented before the legal review is finished worry Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. “As soon as you’re saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it’s going to be a really big issue,” he says.

Probably the most controversial language begins in Section 201, which permits the president to “direct the national response to the cyber threat” if necessary for “the national defense and security.” The White House is supposed to engage in “periodic mapping” of private networks deemed to be critical, and those companies “shall share” requested information with the federal government. (“Cyber” is defined as anything having to do with the Internet, telecommunications, computers, or computer networks.)

“The language has changed but it doesn’t contain any real additional limits,” EFF’s Tien says. “It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)…The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There’s no provision for any administrative process or review. That’s where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it.”

Translation: If your company is deemed “critical,” a new set of regulations kick in involving who you can hire, what information you must disclose, and when the government would exercise control over your computers or network.

The Internet Security Alliance’s Clinton adds that his group is “supportive of increased federal involvement to enhance cyber security, but we believe that the wrong approach, as embodied in this bill as introduced, will be counterproductive both from an national economic and national secuity perspective.”

Update at 3:14 p.m. PDT: I just talked to Jena Longo, deputy communications director for the Senate Commerce committee, on the phone. She sent me e-mail with this statement:

The president of the United States has always had the constitutional authority, and duty, to protect the American people and direct the national response to any emergency that threatens the security and safety of the United States. The Rockefeller-Snowe Cybersecurity bill makes it clear that the president’s authority includes securing our national cyber infrastructure from attack. The section of the bill that addresses this issue, applies specifically to the national response to a severe attack or natural disaster. This particular legislative language is based on longstanding statutory authorities for wartime use of communications networks. To be very clear, the Rockefeller-Snowe bill will not empower a “government shutdown or takeover of the Internet” and any suggestion otherwise is misleading and false. The purpose of this language is to clarify how the president directs the public-private response to a crisis, secure our economy and safeguard our financial networks, protect the American people, their privacy and civil liberties, and coordinate the government’s response.

from: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10320096-38.html

This entry was posted in state security and tagged technocratic social control, technology. Bookmark the permalink.
← Report: Future U.S. heat waves will be worse
Bush’s Search Policy For Travelers Is Kept – Obama Officials Say Oversight Will Grow →
  • Anti-Imperialist Organizations

    • ABCF
    • Addameer
    • Arab Red Aid
    • Bayan-USA
    • CCRSRI
    • CGAGPI
    • DSU-JNU
    • Free Georges Ibrahim Abdallah
    • Free Saadat
    • Frente Independente Popular – RJ
    • ICAWPI
    • ICSPWI – Italy
    • India Solidarity-Germany
    • India Solidarity-Sweden
    • INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE PEOPLE'S WAR IN INDIA
    • International League of Peoples' Struggle
    • International Red Aid
    • Irish Republican Socialist Party
    • Jericho Movement
    • MLKP
    • Network Free All Political Prisoners
    • Parti Communiste du Bénin
    • Party of Labor-Serbia
    • PCRV
    • PFLP
    • Political Prisoners in Peru
    • Prisoner Info
    • Red Action-Croatia
    • Red Aid Switzerland
    • Revolutionary Construction-Switzerland
    • Revolutionary Cultural Front
    • Revolutionary Democratic Front
    • Revolutionary Unity
    • Secours Rouge Belgium
    • SRI
  • Maoist Organizations

    • All India Federation of Labour Unions
    • Análisis y Opinión
    • Andolonpotrika
    • Antigeitonies
    • ATIK
    • Bündnis gegen imperialististische Aggression
    • CARC
    • Cause du Peuple
    • Confederation for Democratic Rights in Europe
    • Democratic Women's Movement
    • El Pueblo
    • Escuela Política Luis Emilio Recabarren
    • FDLP
    • FER Chile
    • Free Margot Liendo
    • Free Osman Morote
    • Gran Marcha Hacia el Comunismo
    • Halkin Gunlugu
    • Initiative RCP (Austria)
    • Kommunistiska Arbetarkommunen
    • Liga dos Camponeses Pobres
    • Liga Operária
    • Maoist Bolshevik Reorganization Movement
    • Maoist Communist Group
    • Maoist Revolutionary League
    • Maoist Road
    • MER-RSM
    • MOVADEF
    • Movimento Estudantil Popular Revolucionário
    • Movimento Feminino Popular
    • Movimento Femminista Proletario Rivoluzionario
    • National Democratic Front of the Philippines
    • New Democratic Women
    • New Democratic Youth
    • Nova Democracia
    • OCFR
    • OCML-VP
    • Organización Maoísta Para la Reconstitución del Partido Comunista de Colombia
    • Partizan
    • Philippine Revolution Web Central
    • Proletarische Revolution Austria
    • Revolutionary Initiative
    • Revolutionary Internationalist Movement
    • Rot Front Kollektiv
    • Servir le Peuple
    • SOL Germany
    • The Next Front
    • Tjen folket
    • UNIÓN OBRERA COMUNISTA (Mlm)
    • Verein der Neuen Demokratie
  • Maoist Parties

    • Communist (Maoist) Party of Afghanistan
    • Communist Party of Bhutan (Marxist-Leninist-Maoist)
    • Communist Party of Ecuador-Red Sun
    • CPI (Maoist)
    • KKE ML
    • Maoist Communist Party of France
    • Maoist Communist Party of Italy
    • Maoist Communist Party/Turkey-North Kurdistan
    • MCP Manipur
    • Purba Bangla Sarbahara Party-Central Committee
    • RCP Canada
    • TKP/ML
  • Resources

    • Africa in Struggle
    • African Activist Archive Project
    • ANF News
    • Archiv Schwarzer Stern
    • Arm the Spirit Archive
    • Bianet-English
    • Bombard the Headquarters!
    • Camarades
    • CEDEMA
    • Cellules Communistes Combattantes
    • China Labor Bulletin
    • Chuang
    • Communist Working Group Archive
    • Corrispondenza Internazionale
    • CPI (Maoist) Information Bulletin
    • CSPP
    • Daily Cultural Revolution
    • Dazibao Rojo
    • DEM VOLKE DIENEN
    • Dialectical Materialism in China
    • Documents of GP
    • Documents of UFCML
    • Đã Thành Đồ Sơn
    • Early American Marxism
    • El Topo Blindado
    • EROL
    • Farmland Grab
    • Freedom Archives
    • Freilassung
    • Frontier Weekly
    • German Left Poster Archive
    • GPCR Archive
    • IISH Red Army Faction Archive
    • Insurrection News
    • International Red News
    • IRISH REPUBLICAN MARXIST HISTORY PROJECT
    • Israeli Left Archive
    • Isyandan
    • Jinha News
    • L’Internationale
    • Left Russia
    • Liberation Magazine 1967-72
    • MAO Projekt
    • Mao Selected Works
    • Marx to Mao
    • MG documentation
    • ML Translations
    • MLM Mayhem!
    • MLM RSG
    • Naxalbari Magazine
    • New Turkey
    • Other Aspect
    • Palestine Poster Project Archive
    • Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity
    • Peking Review
    • Peoples March
    • Peoples Truth
    • PFOC Archive
    • Red News-Lal Shongbad
    • Remembering Lorena Barros
    • Research Unit for Political Economy
    • Resistance & Repression in Greece
    • Revolutionary Democracy
    • Revolutionary Literature Archive
    • Revolutionary Struggle in Italy Archive
    • Rojava Report
    • Ruinas Digitales
    • Samidoun
    • Sanhati
    • SDS Archives
    • sebben he siamo donne
    • Servir ao Povo de Todo Coração
    • Sınıf Teorisi
    • Textos y Documentos del PCP
    • The Workers Dreadnought
    • Throw Out Your Books
    • Turkey Harvest
    • Western Ghats War Front
    • Women Against Sexual Violence and State Repression
    • Works of Charu Mazumdar
    • Works of Siraj Sikder
  • Categories

    • agricultures
    • capital and class
    • conflict within the movement
    • ecological crisis
    • Editor's desk
    • fascist attacks
    • Maoists India
    • news
    • opinion
    • patriarchy
    • prisons
    • privacy
    • resistance
    • state control
    • state security
    • strategy and tactics
    • technology
    • Uncategorized
    • war
    • war on drugs
    • Women Martyrs of The Indian Revolution
  • Recent Posts

    • Letter from your Editor
    • People’s War in India Clippings 11/8/2016
    • Passing of communist activist and union militant Himadri Sen Roy
    • People’s War in India Clippings 8/8/2016
    • People’s War in India Clippings 1/8/2016
    • Brief History of the Armed Communist Formations (FCA)
    • Boycott (World) Social Forum, a Safety Valve for Imperialism
    • ‘Give us Eylem Ataş’s body’
    • People’s War in India Clippings 30/7/2016
    • People’s War in India Clippings 29/7/2016
    • Indian Democracy Unmasked: BJP-RSS and the politics of Communal Hatred-CAFAU
    • Brief history of the Revolutionary Communist Commitee (CoCoRi)
    • People’s War in India Clippings 26/7/2016
    • 12 detained in house raids in Dersim
    • People’s War in India Clippings 24/7/2016
    • People’s War in India Clippings 22/7/2016
    • HBDH: 11 riot police killed in Trabzon
    • Armed wing of Maoist Communist Party eliminates reactionary solder
    • Responsibility claim for the execution of mafioso Habibi in June , Exarhia area – Athens , Greece
    • About the attempted military coup in Turkey KKE (ml)
  • Tags

    • anarchists
    • armed struggle
    • austerity
    • bangladesh
    • chile
    • china
    • counter insurgency
    • ecocide
    • egypt
    • energy
    • france
    • greece
    • history
    • immigration
    • india
    • indonesia
    • international communist movement
    • italy
    • just another police murder
    • kurdistan
    • land tenure
    • low intensity conflict
    • manipur
    • maoism
    • maoist
    • naxal
    • nepal
    • nigeria
    • pakistan
    • palestine
    • peru
    • philippines
    • radical right
    • repression
    • revisionism
    • riot
    • social tension
    • south africa
    • state terror
    • strike
    • tunisia
    • turkey
    • united kingdom
    • united states
    • worker resistance
  • Archives

Signalfire
Proudly powered by WordPress.